LAW 203: Constitutional Law
This course is part of the required first-year JD curriculum. This course offers an introduction to American constitutional law. In addition to examining questions of interpretive method, the course focuses on the powers of the federal government and the allocation of decision making authority among government institutions, including both federalism and separation of powers. Class participation, attendance, written assignments, and final exam. This course is open to first-year Law School students only.
Terms: Win
| Units: 3
LAW 207: Criminal Law
This course is part of the required first-year JD curriculum. It examines the traditional general issues in the substantive criminal law, including the purposes of punishment and the appropriate limits on the use of the criminal sanction. It focuses predominantly on how criminal statutes are organized around objective offense elements (conduct, causation, and attendant circumstances) and mental states, and to a lesser degree on inchoate crimes, complicity, justification and excuse.
Terms: Win
| Units: 4
LAW 224A: Federal Litigation in a Global Context: Coursework
This course builds on the writing skills developed in Legal Writing. Students submit and orally argue one persuasive brief on a motion in federal district court. Students represent the plaintiff or defendant in a simulated global torts case that raises complex issues of federal civil procedure. Students work in an open universe with the online legal research tools, bluebook the cases, plan litigation strategy, peer review drafts, and moot a motion. This course depends on participation; attendance is mandatory. Winter grading reflects students' written work, including outlines, drafts, final briefs, citation, and professionalism. This course is open to first-year JD students only.
Terms: Win
| Units: 2
| Repeatable
2 times
(up to 4 units total)
LAW 400: Directed Research
Directed Research is an extraordinary opportunity for students beyond the first-year to research problems in any field of law. Directed research credit may not be awarded for work that duplicates the work of a course, clinic, or externship for which the student has registered. Directed research credit may be awarded for work that expands on work initially assigned in, or conceived during, a course, clinic, or externship, but only if the continued work represents a meaningful and substantial contribution to the already existing project, significantly beyond mere editing or polishing. If a student seeks to continue or expand on work that the student initiated previously (whether for a course, clinic, externship, or otherwise) a student must (1) share the initial work with the professor supervising the directed research, to the extent that work is non-privileged, and (2) obtain permission for the expansion from the instructor or supervisor who supervised the initial project. The final pro
more »
Directed Research is an extraordinary opportunity for students beyond the first-year to research problems in any field of law. Directed research credit may not be awarded for work that duplicates the work of a course, clinic, or externship for which the student has registered. Directed research credit may be awarded for work that expands on work initially assigned in, or conceived during, a course, clinic, or externship, but only if the continued work represents a meaningful and substantial contribution to the already existing project, significantly beyond mere editing or polishing. If a student seeks to continue or expand on work that the student initiated previously (whether for a course, clinic, externship, or otherwise) a student must (1) share the initial work with the professor supervising the directed research, to the extent that work is non-privileged, and (2) obtain permission for the expansion from the instructor or supervisor who supervised the initial project. The final product must be embodied in a paper or other form of written work involving a substantial independent effort on the part of the student. A student must submit a detailed petition of at least 250 words, approved by the sponsoring faculty member, outlining his or her proposed project and demonstrating that the research is likely to result in a significant scholarly contribution. A student may petition for "Directed Research: Curricular Development" when the work involves assisting a Law School faculty member in developing concepts or materials for new and innovative law school courses. Both the supervising faculty member and the Associate Dean for Curriculum must approve petition for "Directed Research: Curricular Development." Students must meet with the instructor frequently for the purposes of report and guidance. Unit credit and grading basis (H/P/R/F or MP/R/F) is by arrangement up to the allowable limit. Students whose projects warrant more than four units should consider a Senior Thesis or the Research Track (See SLS Student Handbook for requirements and limitations). With the approval of the instructor, successful completion of a directed research project of two units or more may satisfy the JD writing requirement to the extent of one research writing course (R course). See Directed Research under Curricular Options in the SLS Student Handbook for requirements and limitations. Directed Research petitions are available on the Law School Registrar's Office website (see Forms and Petitions). Elements used in grading: Paper and as agreed to by instructor.
Terms: Aut, Win, Spr
| Units: 1-4
| Repeatable
8 times
(up to 8 units total)
Instructors:
Anderson, M. (PI)
;
Bartlett, R. (PI)
;
Meyler, B. (PI)
...
more instructors for LAW 400 »
Instructors:
Anderson, M. (PI)
;
Bartlett, R. (PI)
;
Meyler, B. (PI)
;
Ouellette, L. (PI)
;
Sivas, D. (PI)
;
Triantis, G. (PI)
;
Weiner, A. (PI)
;
Weisberg, R. (PI)
LAW 403: Senior Thesis
An opportunity for third-year students to engage in original research and to prepare a substantial written-work product on the scale of a law review article. The thesis topic should be chosen no later than two weeks after the beginning of the seventh term of law study and may be chosen during the sixth term. The topic is subject to the approval of the thesis supervisor, who may be any member of the Law School faculty under whose direction the student wishes to write the thesis and who is willing to assume the responsibility therefor. An oral defense of the thesis before members of the faculty, including the thesis supervisor, will be conducted late in the student's ninth academic term. Acceptance of the thesis for credit requires the approval of the thesis supervisor and one or more other members of the faculty who will be selected by the supervisor. Satisfactory completion of the senior thesis will satisfy graduation requirements to the extent of (a) 5 - 8 units of credit and (b) two
more »
An opportunity for third-year students to engage in original research and to prepare a substantial written-work product on the scale of a law review article. The thesis topic should be chosen no later than two weeks after the beginning of the seventh term of law study and may be chosen during the sixth term. The topic is subject to the approval of the thesis supervisor, who may be any member of the Law School faculty under whose direction the student wishes to write the thesis and who is willing to assume the responsibility therefor. An oral defense of the thesis before members of the faculty, including the thesis supervisor, will be conducted late in the student's ninth academic term. Acceptance of the thesis for credit requires the approval of the thesis supervisor and one or more other members of the faculty who will be selected by the supervisor. Satisfactory completion of the senior thesis will satisfy graduation requirements to the extent of (a) 5 - 8 units of credit and (b) two research courses. The exact requirements for a senior thesis are in the discretion of the supervising faculty member. Unit credit and grading basis (H/P/R/F or MP/R/F) is by arrangement up to the allowable limit. Special Instructions: Two Research credits are possible. Elements used in grading: Paper and as agreed to by instructor.
Terms: Aut, Win, Spr
| Units: 5-8
| Repeatable
3 times
(up to 9 units total)
LAW 406: Research Track
The Research Track is for students who wish to carry out a research project of a scope larger than that contemplated for a Senior Thesis. Research Track projects are to be supervised by two or more professors, at least one of whom must be a member of the Law School faculty. At least one faculty member in addition to the supervisors must read the written product of the research, and the student must defend the written work orally before the readers. Students will be admitted to Research Track only if they have a demonstrated capability for substantial independent research, and propose a significant and well-formulated project at the time of application. Special Instructions: Two Research credits are possible. Unit credit and grading basis (H/P/R/F or MP/R/F) is by arrangement up to the allowable limit. Elements used in grading: Paper and as agreed to by instructor.
Terms: Aut, Win, Spr
| Units: 9-12
| Repeatable
for credit
LAW 802: TGR: Dissertation
TGR: Dissertation
Terms: Aut, Win, Spr
| Units: 0
| Repeatable
for credit
LAW 809E: Policy Practicum: AI For Legal Help
Can AI increase access to justice, by helping people resolve their legal problems in more accessible, equitable, and effective ways? What are the risks that AI poses for people seeking legal guidance, that technical and policy guardrails should mitigate? In this course, students will work on teams, each of which will have a partner organization from the justice system and an interest in using AI to improve services. Partner organizations include frontline legal aid and court groups interested in using AI to improve their ability to help people dealing with evictions, criminal justice problems, debt collection, domestic violence, and other legal problems. Using human-centered design practices, students will help their partners scope out exactly where AI and other interventions might serve both the providers and the clients, what quality benchmarks should guide any new intervention, and what datasets and other projects could jumpstart a new technology initiative. Using this design work,
more »
Can AI increase access to justice, by helping people resolve their legal problems in more accessible, equitable, and effective ways? What are the risks that AI poses for people seeking legal guidance, that technical and policy guardrails should mitigate? In this course, students will work on teams, each of which will have a partner organization from the justice system and an interest in using AI to improve services. Partner organizations include frontline legal aid and court groups interested in using AI to improve their ability to help people dealing with evictions, criminal justice problems, debt collection, domestic violence, and other legal problems. Using human-centered design practices, students will help their partners scope out exactly where AI and other interventions might serve both the providers and the clients, what quality benchmarks should guide any new intervention, and what datasets and other projects could jumpstart a new technology initiative. Using this design work, teams will establish important guidelines to ensure that any new AI project is centered on the needs of people, and developed with a careful eye towards ethical and legal principles. This multi-stakeholder and policy research will then turn towards creative, design-driven technology development. Student teams will build a demonstration project to determine if AI is able to accomplish the legal tasks they have identified in their design research. They will consult with subject matter experts to help evaluate the AI's performance and go through iterative development cycles to refine their intervention to better meet the quality benchmarks they've established. Student teams will present their design research and technical system demo to their partners and a broader audience, for critical discussion about the next steps for the projects. They might continue to work on the efforts after the quarter or might help their partner move towards other sustainable models that could allow them to further develop, deploy, and maintain AI-powered projects to enhance their legal services. The students' learnings about engaging in responsible AI development with public interest partners will be useful to others working on AI for community agencies, government and civic tech, and high-stakes legal services. Students will be required to complete ethical training for human subjects research, which takes approximately 2 hours through the CITI program online. The students' final report will contribute to policy and technology discussions about the principles, benchmarks, and risk typologies that can guide the ethical development of AI platforms for access to justice. Students are able, but not required, to enroll in both Fall and Winter quarters of the class. The class may be extended to Spring quarter, depending on the issues raised. Elements used in grading: Attendance, Performance, Class Participation, and Written Assignments. CONSENT APPLICATION: To apply for this course, students must complete and submit a Consent Application Form available at SLS Registrar
https://registrar.law.stanford.edu/. Cross-listed with the d.school (
DESIGN 809E).
Terms: Aut, Win
| Units: 3
| Repeatable
3 times
(up to 9 units total)
Instructors:
Al Haider, N. (PI)
;
Hagan, M. (PI)
LAW 809F: Policy Practicum: Regilla Project: Women Convicted of Intimate Partner Violence-Related Homicides
This practicum will prepare for, facilitate, and draw lessons from a multi-stakeholder Roundtable on the legal system's treatment of women accused of homicides that grow out of their experiences of intimate partner violence. The Stanford Criminal Justice Center issued a new report, Fatal Peril: Unheard Stories from the IPV-to-Prison Pipeline, in Summer 2024. On November 12, 2024, we will convene a diverse group of 25 California-based stakeholders -- researchers, advocates, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, corrections officials, and gubernatorial and legislative policymakers -- to brainstorm and develop a consensus-driven set of state-specific legal and policy recommendations in response to the findings of the report. Recommendations will address the continuum of the criminal legal system from law enforcement through parole. The Roundtable will take place at Stanford. Students will be involved in planning the Roundtable, including helping to set the agenda and developing backgrou
more »
This practicum will prepare for, facilitate, and draw lessons from a multi-stakeholder Roundtable on the legal system's treatment of women accused of homicides that grow out of their experiences of intimate partner violence. The Stanford Criminal Justice Center issued a new report, Fatal Peril: Unheard Stories from the IPV-to-Prison Pipeline, in Summer 2024. On November 12, 2024, we will convene a diverse group of 25 California-based stakeholders -- researchers, advocates, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, corrections officials, and gubernatorial and legislative policymakers -- to brainstorm and develop a consensus-driven set of state-specific legal and policy recommendations in response to the findings of the report. Recommendations will address the continuum of the criminal legal system from law enforcement through parole. The Roundtable will take place at Stanford. Students will be involved in planning the Roundtable, including helping to set the agenda and developing background materials for Roundtable participants, and synthesizing the discussions and recommendations arising from the Roundtable into a Roundtable white paper issued by the Stanford Criminal Justice Center in 2025. Students will write background papers for Roundtable participants on discrete legal and policy issues; help set the Roundtable agenda and facilitate Roundtable discussions; synthesize Roundtable minutes; research promising practices; and help to draft a full Roundtable white paper with law and policy recommendations. During the Fall 2024 quarter, the policy lab will meet on Thursdays from 10:00-11:00 am. The Roundtable will take place on Tuesday, November 12 from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM and students enrolled in the policy lab will be expected to attend the entire event. One or two students may receive academic credit in Winter 2025 to finalize the white paper. Elements used in grading: Attendance, Performance, Class Participation, Written Assignments, Final Paper. Application process: Interested students should submit a Policy Lab application (go to link SLS Registrar
https://registrar.law.stanford.edu/) and copy of their resume, transcript, and a one-page statement describing their interest and relevant experience by Friday, September 20 to Debbie Mukamal (dmukamal@
law.stanford.edu).
Terms: Aut, Win
| Units: 2
| Repeatable
2 times
(up to 6 units total)
LAW 809X: Policy Practicum: Roses Talk: Elevating At-Promise Student Voices in San Jose Unified
Despite decades of efforts to remediate racial disparities in education, low-income schools serving predominantly students of color continue to face significant challenges that perpetuate unequal educational outcomes. While no single solution can solve these complex issues, insights from the most marginalized students offer an underutilized source of knowledge that can drive more effective policies and practices. This policy lab seeks to directly address persistent disparities in education by elevating at-promise student voices in school and district decision making, reshaping our thinking around and approaches to advancing educational equity. With over 25,000 students, SJUSD is the largest school district in Santa Clara County, the county where Stanford University is located. District leaders and administrators at Gunderson--a Title I high school in South San Jose--have identified a collective need to better understand how to support "at-promise" students (a positive reframing of "at-
more »
Despite decades of efforts to remediate racial disparities in education, low-income schools serving predominantly students of color continue to face significant challenges that perpetuate unequal educational outcomes. While no single solution can solve these complex issues, insights from the most marginalized students offer an underutilized source of knowledge that can drive more effective policies and practices. This policy lab seeks to directly address persistent disparities in education by elevating at-promise student voices in school and district decision making, reshaping our thinking around and approaches to advancing educational equity. With over 25,000 students, SJUSD is the largest school district in Santa Clara County, the county where Stanford University is located. District leaders and administrators at Gunderson--a Title I high school in South San Jose--have identified a collective need to better understand how to support "at-promise" students (a positive reframing of "at-risk" that is reflected in California education law), those who may fail to earn a high school diploma for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to low scores on standardized tests, disengagement from school, English language learner status, previous suspension or expulsion, involvement in the foster care system, houselessness, and special education. The COVID-19 pandemic has only exacerbated challenges for these students, with metrics of achievement and well-being worsening each year since 2020. Coined by Tupac Shakur and applied to education by Dr. Jeff Duncan-Andrade, the "rose that grew from concrete" is a metaphor for young people who often experience the most challenging environments but nonetheless show unmatched resilience and determination to overcome their circumstances. If these "roses" are given opportunities to talk, what would they tell us about what they need from school to succeed? Reaching this student demographic is critical for several reasons. Being the most marginalized, improving their outcomes can often improve outcomes for all students, school quality, and a district's overall health. These students also bring unique perspectives on schooling because they have benefited the least from it, which may challenge ignorance and certainty around what approaches and programs are most effective in working with them. Most importantly, at-promise students have an exceptionally high potential to make a difference in the world--an ideal that is at the core of the U.S. education system. Our society has a responsibility to help them reach that potential. In this course, Stanford students will conduct focus groups with Gunderson at-promise students to develop policy recommendations that inform school and district decision making--particularly around how to engage and improve outcomes for the most marginalized students in SJUSD. The course offers a unique opportunity for Stanford students to participate in community-engaged learning and research, apply technical skills and academic knowledge to real-world challenges, and contribute to positive educational outcomes for underserved students. It embodies the principle that higher education institutions can and should play a pivotal role in enhancing the quality of K-12 public education for all students. TIMELINE AND EXPECTATIONS: The practicum will be completed in two phases. Phase 1, Winter Quarter: Stanford students will be introduced to basic qualitative research methods, relevant literature, best practices, and impactful laws and policies. They will work collaboratively to develop an interview protocol to use for 1-2 focus groups with Gunderson students. Following data collection, students will engage in qualitative analysis and draft preliminary findings to present to SJUSD and Gunderson leaders for oral and written feedback. Phase 2, Spring Quarter: Based on preliminary findings and feedback, students will formulate interview questions and facilitate a final focus group with Gunderson students to clarify and/or confirm preliminary findings. Students will finalize and draw on their findings to conduct policy research and analysis, legal research and analysis (as needed), and develop evidence-based policy recommendations for the school and school district. Their work will culminate in a final report and presentation to Stanford, SJUSD, and Gunderson leaders in late spring. Please note that this timeline is subject to change. LOGISTICS: Ideally, practicum students would commit to participating in winter and spring quarters. However, students who are only able to participate for winter quarter will also be considered. The winter quarter lab is standard 3-units, while spring quarter lab will be variable 2-3 units to accommodate continuing students. Session meeting times and travel arrangements to/from San Jose will be determined once a final group of practicum students are selected. ENROLLMENT AND GRADING: This class is open to Stanford Law School students, and available for cross-registration for undergraduate and graduate students from across campus. We highly encourage students from outside the Law School to apply, particularly students from the Graduate School of Education. Ideal students will have strong research, writing, and analytical skills, oral communications skills, and a demonstrated commitment to improving educational outcomes for all students. Students will be working together in small teams. Grading will be based on attendance, class performance and participation, collaboration with peers, engagement with high school students, written assignments, and presentations. COURSE OBJECTIVES: (1) Increase at-promise student engagement by amplifying their voices in school and district decision making; (2) equip Stanford students with essential qualitative, policy, and legal research skills and apply these skills in collecting and analyzing data to identify challenges and opportunities for at-promise students; (3) collaborate with peers and instructors to develop evidence-based policy recommendations for improving at-promise student engagement and outcomes, culminating in a final report that influences policies and practices at Gunderson and in SJUSD; and (4) promote diverse perspectives and ideologies by challenging existing beliefs about at-promise students and their communities, encouraging open-mindedness, and fostering thought-provoking conversations about contentious issues that appreciate a wide range of viewpoints. CONSENT APPLICATION AND ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: To apply for this course, students must submit a Consent Application Form at SLS Registrar
https://registrar.law.stanford.edu/. Additionally, students must submit a resume and writing sample via email to Dionna Rangel at drangel@
law.stanford.edu. Please indicate in your email whether you are applying for winter quarter only, or winter and spring quarters. All application materials are due by Sunday, December 15 at 11:59 pm.
Terms: Win, Spr
| Units: 3
| Repeatable
2 times
(up to 6 units total)
Filter Results: